Did People Actually Like New Coke Better?

The question posed in the title of this article is easy to answer if you’ve already read about the Pepsi taste tests of the 1980s. You see, as part of it’s “Project Kansas” the Coca-Cola company did their own taste tests, comparing its sweeter New Coke formula to the classic Coca-Cola formula. They found, much like Pepsi did, that people preferred the New Coke! This confirmed the company’s nightmare had come true. Not only had Pepsi eaten into Coke’s market share and scored with younger consumers, but their own tests had confirmed that most people liked a sweeter taste in their cola beverage. The company had no choice but to introduce New Coke in order to compete with an ever-growing Pepsi juggernaut. Except, of course, they over-reacted. Coca-Cola drinkers protested loudly. They hated the sweeter tasting new formula. New Coke was off the shelfs in 79 days and “Coca-Cola Classic” sales went through the roof.

New Coke can and advertisements

The Public Didn’t Know They Liked New Coke?

The above causes some people to think that this is a case of “McDonald’s Magic.” That is, that unsophisticated consumers don’t know what they like. They remain loyal to certain products because of other factors, like advertising, cost, addictiveness, etc. In other words, people drink Coca-Cola for the same reason they go to McDonald’s; not because they like it but because of some nebulous, hard-to-pinpoint factors that keep them coming back, like sentimentality. Taste tests confirmed that people liked New Coke better but they insisted that the original formula be brought back anyway.

Or, maybe Coca-Cola had it all planned out in advance. Perhaps this wasn’t the biggest marketing mistake of all time, although it certainly seemed to be. Perhaps, instead, the company temporarily replaced the original Coca-Cola with New Coke to prove a point to people how were no longer buying the product. You’ll miss us when we’re gone! Well, people did miss the original Coca-Cola. The question remains, did they miss the taste, or did they miss the cultural icon?

Why Did the Coca-Cola Company Launch New Coke?

The truth is that Coca-Cola had every reason to fear Pepsi, at least in the short-term. In the early 1980s, Coca-Cola’s market share had dropped to 24 percent after being on top for decades. Pepsi was indeed outselling Coke! To top it off, not only had “The Pepsi Challenge” taste tests turned out in Pepsi’s favor, Coca-Cola’s on tests confirmed this. The mission to replace the old formula with a new sweeter tasting one began, coined the Kansas Project, after a famous photo of a Kansas newsman sipping Coke. The company did more taste-testing between the old and new formulas, and again, people liked the sweeter tasting version better. It was time for something drastic. The company went ahead and introduced its New Coke flavor.

This decision to replace a winning recipe over some taste tests was a bad one. I’ve already explained all the reasons why the Pepsi taste tests were scientifically invalid and the same reasons explain why Coca-Cola’s own taste tests were also invalid. The biggest factor, among others, was that people were sipping small samples and people quite often do prefer a sweeter taste for a few sips or a few bites, but quickly grow tired of the sweetness when drinking an entire soda. This, combined with the huge sentimental value American’s attach to Coca-Cola made the whole research project a colossal miscalculation.

Another Coke Blunder

The company made another miscalculation. They actually considered outright asking people whether they wanted the company to switch to the new sweeter formula. But, “Kansas” was a big industry secret. They didn’t want to competition to know what they were up to. So, they decided not ask, at least in so many words. Instead, they convened asked focus groups whether they would drink the new “Kansas” soda if it were renamed Coke. Such a odd workaround proved to provide some shaky and unclear data. The company considered just keeping both products but didn’t want a new “Cola War” between their own products, further eroding their market share. On the company’s 100th birthday, hoping to make a big splash, the company nixed the original Coca-Cola and introduced New Coke instead, on April 23, 1985.

At that time, I was working at a grocery store. I well remember the absolute outrage and dismay that ensued. Customers were continually asking us when the old Coca-Cola would be available. We had to explain to them that New Coke was here to stay, according to the company. Some people bought up as many of the old bottles as they could find and hoarded them!

The Public Was Outraged That Original Coke Was Gone

The rest is history. People took to the streets, literally dumping bottles on the streets. The company was bombarded with phone calls, boycotts, petitions, etc. According to a psychiatrist the company hired to listen in on some of the hundreds of thousands of phone calls, some customers sounded so distraught on the phone it was as if a beloved family member had died. On July 11, the company announced that it would bring back the original Coca-Cola. At first, “Coca-Cola Classic” shared shelf space with New Coke, but soon, New Coke was gone and so was the “classic” moniker on old Coke. I was never as upset as other folks. I oscillated between Dr Pepper and Mr. Pibb (the soda machine at the grocery store had Mr. Pibb for a quarter).

Admittedly, some people, including journalist, bashed New Coke before they even tried it. And some of those folks  who rushed out to buy up hundreds of dollars worth of old Coke never even bothered to try New Coke, either. 1 To many, the whole idea was abhorrent. Entire books have been written on this premise. But, the new formula was also abhorrent, according to those who did try it, including myself. If I wanted sweeter, I could have a Pepsi.

Coca-Cola’s statement shows that they hadn’t yet learned the lesson: “We did not understand the deep emotions of so many of our customers for Coca-Cola.” It’s very true that those emotions played a role. But, this didn’t stop many customers from finding other products to buy during that short time New Coke was on the shelves, and some of those folks kept on buying those new drinks. The idea that there were other factors more important than taste was and is still though to be a valid one. But, while there are indeed many factors that caused Coca-Cola to commit such a huge marketing mistake, the biggest factor was a failure of scientific rigor. Too much confidence was placed in taste tests that gave misleading data. The bottom line is this: People liked the taste of the original Coca-Cola better. Soon after the relaunch, Coca-Cola was back on top, shaken, but not beaten. 2

The Failure Of New Coke Was NOT Only Due to Public Perception

Despite all this, many sources insist that people didn’t like New Coke “despite” the success of the blind taste tests and that the public felt betrayed when it was revealed that the reason for the tests was to replace original Coca-Cola. The idea that the failure of New Coke was only a matter of public perception and nostalgia is a modern myth and anybody who was alive at the time, like myself, can tell you different. Yes, public perception was one part of the failure, but taste was the bigger one. The taste tests only appeared to show that the public preferred New Coke as a beverage. Not all tests are valid and not all empirical results can be relied upon. People might have preferred a sip or two of New Coke but they continued to prefer original Coca-Cola as a beverage drunk in typical amounts.

drinking a coke

Is the ‘How Coca-Cola Reacts to Stomach Acid’ Video Real?

A video on YouTube entitled ‘Experiment Pouring Coca-Cola in Stomach Acid!! – Epic Reaction!,’ or ‘How Coke Reacts to Stomach Acid,’ between YouTube and Facebook, has been viewed millions of...
Read More
References
  1. Oliver, Thomas. The Real Coke, the Real Story. United Kingdom, Random House Publishing Group, 2013.
  2. Fawcett, Bill. 100 Mistakes that Changed History: Backfires and Blunders That Collapsed Empires, Crashed Economies, and Altered the Course of Our World. United States, Penguin Publishing Group, 2010.